Unless the fix is invasive, I'd suggest fixing for this release. That's not
exactly an obscure use of inout.
On 12/8/2011 8:50 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> In any case, there needs to be a bugzilla entry for it.
>
> On 12/8/2011 7:39 PM, Steve Schveighoffer wrote:
>> Still fails my latest mentioned regression:
>>
>> inout(int[]) foo(inout(int)[] x)
>> {
>> return x;
>> }
>>
>>
>> Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (x) of type inout(int)[] to
>> inout(int[])
>>
>>
>> Given that inout is relatively new to the implementation, I'm not sure how
>> much existing code this breaks. It
>> certainly breaks dcollections, but I can just instruct people not to use
>> 2.057, and I haven't done a beta release of
>> it since I added the inout decorations.
>>
>> So it might not be horrible if this goes out. There is a valid workaround
>> (use a blunt cast).
>>
>> Again, sorry for the last-minute testing. I've been busy with work lately.
>>
>> -Steve
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: Walter Bright<[email protected]>
>>> To: Discuss the dmd beta releases for D<[email protected]>
>>> Cc:
>>> Sent: Thursday, December 8, 2011 9:47 PM
>>> Subject: [dmd-beta] Last (really, this time I mean it!) D2 beta 2.057
>>>
>>> Includes Kenji's fix (thanks for the super quick response!)
>>>
>>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
