The problem is we lose another day of work doing this.
On 12/8/2011 9:15 PM, Brad Roberts wrote:
Unless the fix is invasive, I'd suggest fixing for this release. That's not
exactly an obscure use of inout.
On 12/8/2011 8:50 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
In any case, there needs to be a bugzilla entry for it.
On 12/8/2011 7:39 PM, Steve Schveighoffer wrote:
Still fails my latest mentioned regression:
inout(int[]) foo(inout(int)[] x)
{
return x;
}
Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (x) of type inout(int)[] to
inout(int[])
Given that inout is relatively new to the implementation, I'm not sure how much
existing code this breaks. It
certainly breaks dcollections, but I can just instruct people not to use 2.057,
and I haven't done a beta release of
it since I added the inout decorations.
So it might not be horrible if this goes out. There is a valid workaround (use
a blunt cast).
Again, sorry for the last-minute testing. I've been busy with work lately.
-Steve
----- Original Message -----
From: Walter Bright<[email protected]>
To: Discuss the dmd beta releases for D<[email protected]>
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, December 8, 2011 9:47 PM
Subject: [dmd-beta] Last (really, this time I mean it!) D2 beta 2.057
Includes Kenji's fix (thanks for the super quick response!)
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
