On 4/12/12, Michel Fortin <[email protected]> wrote: > Even if declaring C functions with ref is allowed, it can sometime be a > problem to declare C functions like that. Not only it changes the usage, but > also it's not too rare to see pointer parameters like this accepting a null > pointer as a way to make the parameter optional, which ref won't let you do.
For C, yes, but for C++ wrappers it's usually the D wrapper code that implements default arguments, not the C function declarations. _______________________________________________ dmd-beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
