On Friday, April 13, 2012 22:18:16 Don Clugston wrote: > Interestingly, the ref int[3] idiom is documented as working, under > 'interfacing with C'. > Anything beyond that seems to be undefined. > That page seems to document dynamic arrays as _not_ working -- > certainly as having no C equivalent.
Which seems really backwards considering that in both case, you'd be using T* in C, and if anything, dynamic arrays are closer to that than static arrays. Personally, I'd have expected arr.ptr to be required in both cases. - Jonathan M Davis _______________________________________________ dmd-beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
