Ye, because D users can for sure check what is valid and what it is not - all they need is just look up the spec... Oh, wait. I'll better continue in fresh shiny stability thread :)
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Jonathan M Davis <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thursday, May 23, 2013 08:11:29 Jacob Carlborg wrote: >> On May 23, 2013, at 09:43 AM, Walter Bright <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Yes, but I don't know which one. The issue is attempting to declare: >> > >> > shared int foo() { ... } >> > >> > where shared would apply to the 'this' reference, but there is no 'this' >> > reference. This was an "accepts invalid code" bug in the compiler. >> >> I absolutely agree. The change is correct. But there's no deprecation >> messages or warnings, I don't know if it would be possible though to add. > > If it's "Accepts Invalid," I wouldn't think that a deprecation message or > warning would be appropriate. It's code that shouldn't even have compiled in > the first place, not a feature that's been removed. > > - Jonathan M Davis > _______________________________________________ > dmd-beta mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta _______________________________________________ dmd-beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
