That behavior has been introduced by fixing issue 9199. But the way was not good, because it unnecessarily breaks existing code. I opened a new enhancement http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10150 to fix the regressions and more consistent compiler behavior. How about that?
Kenji Hara 2013/5/23 Jacob Carlborg <[email protected]> > On May 23, 2013, at 09:43 AM, Walter Bright <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Yes, but I don't know which one. The issue is attempting to declare: > > shared int foo() { ... } > > where shared would apply to the 'this' reference, but there is no 'this' > reference. This was an "accepts invalid code" bug in the compiler. > > > I absolutely agree. The change is correct. But there's no deprecation > messages or warnings, I don't know if it would be possible though to add. > > -- > /Jacob Carlborg > > _______________________________________________ > dmd-beta mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta >
_______________________________________________ dmd-beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
