On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 7:10 AM, Brad Anderson <[email protected]> wrote: > http://wiki.dlang.org/Simplified_Release_Process_Proposal
Even though I'm not sure whether this proposal is the best choice, let me point out that it gets one point very right, compared to the current state: After a release is created, the branch needs to be merged back into master. Otherwise, people just tracking the release tags (like we tend to do for the ldc druntime/Phobos repositories) will usually get a slew of conflicts due to commits cherry-picked onto the release branch or conflicting release-only changes. Doing this at the point of the release has the advantage that the release manager is the one who knows what went where for what reasons, and that they still have all the details in their working memory. I suspect that liberal use of cherry-picking will make this process a bit more annoying than necessary, but it could be that the simplification of the process indeed outweighs this extra bit of effort. David _______________________________________________ dmd-beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
