I must admit, I didn't read carefully enough in my haste. That would indeed work.
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 9:20 AM, David Nadlinger <[email protected]>wrote: > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 7:10 AM, Brad Anderson <[email protected]> wrote: > > One problem is that with the > > current approach it's impossible to do a bugfix only release without > > freezing all feature development (i.e. cherry-picking is forbidden but > all > > commits must still go to master) which is unacceptable and was the > original > > reason why a Release Process was created. > > What are you referring to as the "current approach" here? The way > things have been done in the past, or the proposal at > http://wiki.dlang.org/Release_Process? > > I'm pretty sure the latter actually addresses this problem as well: A > fix that addresses regression or critical bug is merged into the > oldest release branch it should end up on, and then merged > subsequently into all newer release branches and master > (http://wiki.dlang.org/Release_Process#Regression_fix). > > David > _______________________________________________ > dmd-beta mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta >
_______________________________________________ dmd-beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
