On 1/24/2014 1:53 PM, Andrew Edwards wrote:
On 1/24/14, 4:34 PM, Brad Roberts wrote:

Why not call the branch 2.065, like it was for a while and similar to every other branch and build number we've used forever? It shouldn't contain the trailing .0 as the branch is for the entire 2.065 series, not just one build. I'm less concerned with the leading 0 in the second tier, though that naming scheme has been used for the entire life of the D project and would only cause problems if we somehow get more than 999 releases. I see no reason to change it.
You got it. Lets put this horse to bed. 2.065 it is.


+1 Let's do it.
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta

Reply via email to