On 1/24/14, 10:50 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/24/2014 1:53 PM, Andrew Edwards wrote:
On 1/24/14, 4:34 PM, Brad Roberts wrote:
Why not call the branch 2.065, like it was for a while and similar
to every other branch and build number we've used forever? It
shouldn't contain the trailing .0 as the branch is for the entire
2.065 series, not just one build. I'm less concerned with the
leading 0 in the second tier, though that naming scheme has been
used for the entire life of the D project and would only cause
problems if we somehow get more than 999 releases. I see no reason
to change it.
You got it. Lets put this horse to bed. 2.065 it is.
+1 Let's do it.
Already done.
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
