On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Andrew Edwards <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2/24/14, 1:54 AM, Daniel Murphy wrote: >> >> I don't think merging back into master is feasible at this point. We have >> been merging fixes to master first, then cherry-picking/rebasing them to the >> release branch, and I don't think a merge to master is necessary or >> desirable with this model. >> > Make sense to me.
Please don't just skip over the entire earlier discussion like this. @Daniel: I'd argue that it is only really necessary and desirable precisely in that model, because the Git history holds all the merging information otherwise anyway. But I really thought we were done with this discussion some weeks ago… David _______________________________________________ dmd-beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
