On 1/18/12 3:41 PM, Don Clugston wrote:
From 5 years 8 months to 5 years 6 months. I don't think we get much leverage from that.
We must start somewhere, and with time the "de-aging" process will accelerate. Without giving old bugs due process, we undermine people's confidence that we're thorough and that every bug will be ultimately looked at.
We don't have the resources to improve either the number of open bugs, or the age of the oldest bug, by enough that anybody would care. By contrast... REGRESSIONS.
I agree regressions are important. But we shouldn't frame things as "either we look at older bugs or fix regressions". I think each release should pay attention to both.
Andrei _______________________________________________ dmd-internals mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals
