Yeah, that's really how I interpret 'blocker' too. Regards, Alex
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 2:05 AM, Jonathan M Davis <[email protected]>wrote: > On Friday, April 27, 2012 15:50:57 Walter Bright wrote: > > > http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&bug_severity > > > =regression&bug_severity=blocker&bug_severity=critical&bug_status=NEW&bug_st > > atus=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED > > > > 69 of 'em, this is what we should be trying to tamp down > > I would note that if "blocker" meant anything like it's name would > indicate, > we should _never_ do a release with any blockers still in bugzilla. > Whether we > really want to function that way or not, I don't know, but that would be > what > the term indicates, and that's _not_ how we've been functioning. > > - Jonathan M Davis > _______________________________________________ > dmd-internals mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals >
_______________________________________________ dmd-internals mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals
