The severity level is set by the submitter. I think that we can either spend
time arguing over what severity level it should be, or we can spend the time
fixing them.
On 4/27/2012 5:10 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
Yeah, that's really how I interpret 'blocker' too.
Regards,
Alex
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 2:05 AM, Jonathan M Davis <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On Friday, April 27, 2012 15:50:57 Walter Bright wrote:
>
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&bug_severity
<http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&bug_severity>
>
=regression&bug_severity=blocker&bug_severity=critical&bug_status=NEW&bug_st
> atus=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED
>
> 69 of 'em, this is what we should be trying to tamp down
I would note that if "blocker" meant anything like it's name would indicate,
we should _never_ do a release with any blockers still in bugzilla. Whether
we
really want to function that way or not, I don't know, but that would be
what
the term indicates, and that's _not_ how we've been functioning.
- Jonathan M Davis
_______________________________________________
dmd-internals mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals
