On 07/09/2015 03:45 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote: > Recently got on-board with Semaphore-CI (better platform than > Travis-CI IMO)
Well adding D to the list of supported PLs always helps our visibility, but then again there is way more important stuff to do than adding a Travis-CI alternative. It's also an endless job to add support for all CI systems. http://www.slant.co/topics/186/compare/~circleci_vs_shippable_vs_travis > currently investigating using their docker-beta platform to push out binary tarballs For release building? Are you cross-compiling? That would be interesting for dmd as well. VirtualBox doesn't make things faster, but cross-compiling comes with it's own drawbacks. > Download paths needs an overhaul. In retrospect I think it's > not a good idea to update D frontend versions in GCC release > branches. Not sure. In the long-run you want to move gdc into the gcc repo, so gcc's version numbers should be dominant. I think 4.9.2+2.068.0 perfectly makes sense. How does gccgo handle this?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dmd-internals mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals
