On 07/09/2015 09:56 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote: > If I imposed this more strictly, we would instead have: > > 4.8.4+2.064.2 > 4.9.2+2.065.0 > 5.1.0+2.066.1 > 6.0.0+2.067-dev > > Yes, DMD releases take so long, they are pretty much in sync with GCC. > (Although, still one release behind DMD by the time I manage to complete > the merge ;-)
We're trying to adopt a 2 month release cycle with a point release in between.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dmd-internals mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals
