What would that gain us? I eventually come back to my open PRs...
On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 12:11 AM, Andrej Mitrovic via dmd-internals <[email protected]> wrote: > It seems that after open pulls page 4 or so on the DMD side of things > a pretty large number of PRs are completely broken and haven't been > touched in months, or worse in years. E.g. > https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/4658 > > There is really no benefit to having PRs just sit idly like that. > > I think we could automate the clean-up of stale pulls and we could > even do it in stages: > > After X amount of time we could make `dlang-bot` attempt to notify the > author of his stale PR, then let some more time pass again, and if the > PR is still in bad shape `dlang-bot` would close the PR, send a > notification to the PR author about the pull being closed, but also CC > to dmd-internals / phobos-internals / etc in case the author went AWOL > so we have a chance of picking up the work from there. > > Thoughts? > _______________________________________________ > dmd-internals mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals _______________________________________________ dmd-internals mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals
