On 06/27/2016 02:42 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: >> On Jun 27, 2016, at 5:00 AM, Михаил Страшун via dmd-internals >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> I also wanted to import all implemented DIPs from wiki but have some >> doubts about how better to proceed with it. Problem is that old DIPs are >> really of terrible quality by the standards we want to set up for new >> submissions - importing them as they are would give a very bad example >> to follow. >> >> Would anyone mind if those are rewrited the retrospectively to contain >> more information about state of art? > > I would say any DIPs that are already approved or implemented should be > copied for historical reasons. Any other ones should be left alone, and if > the author still wishes to pursue, they should open a new DIP using the new > process. > > -Steve >
I agree. My question was about should they be copied untouched or adapted to requirements of Template.md
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dmd-internals mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals
