On 6/30/2016 4:09 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:

On 30 Jun 2016, at 00:15, Walter Bright via dmd-internals 
<[email protected]> wrote:

I thought all Boost required was leaving the notice intact.

It requires attribution for distribution source code, but not binary code. But 
that does not make much sense for a document.

Since a lot of our docs are generated from source code, I think it would be confusing to mix Boost licenses in with CC licenses.
_______________________________________________
dmd-internals mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals

Reply via email to