Hi Deomid, On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:49:40 +0000, Deomid Ryabkov wrote: > Added missing newlines. > > Output before: > --- > Handle 0x0036, DMI type 43, 31 bytes > TPM Device > Vendor ID: > Specification Version: 9.9 Firmware Revision: 9.99 > Description: xxx Characteristics: > Family configurable via platform software support > OEM-specific Information: 0x00000000 > --- > after: > --- > Handle 0x0036, DMI type 43, 31 bytes > TPM Device > Vendor ID: > Specification Version: 9.9 > Firmware Revision: 9.99 > Description: xxx > Characteristics: > Family configurable via platform software support > OEM-specific Information: 0x00000000 > ---
Doh. Obviously correct. The reason why I missed that is that I did not have any machine implementing that type when I wrote the code. I still don't, actually... Would you consider sending me (in private) the binary dump of your DMI table (as generated by "dmidecode --dump-bin") so that I can add it to my non-regression test suite? Consider that one applied too, thanks. -- Jean Delvare SUSE L3 Support _______________________________________________ https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dmidecode-devel
