Hi JC,
>> I challenge you to remove all MN related text (I think Wen pointed out >> almost all of them) from the draft and say that considerations in >> Section 7 of RFC 5213 apply. >> >> How about that? > > [JCZ] RFC 5213 does have non-normative MN-related text in multiple sections > (beyond section 7), Yes, like section 6.2, 6.5, 6.6, 6.13 and 8.6. > which is needed to understand the PMIPv6 concept. The same applies to our > draft, which builds on top of RFC 5213 and the NETEXT extensions. I believe > it would be redundant to repeat the same considerations. > I am OK if you can say that say that considerations in Section 7, 6.2, 6.5, 6.6, 6.13 and 8.6.of RFC 5213 apply. That would settle things. For example you are gonna have to remove configures Pref B and others. Regards, Behcet _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
