Hi, all I think [2] is more suitable for the gap analysis and as the base of further discussion.
BR, Yang ================== Yang Cui, Ph.D. Huawei Technologies [email protected] > |-----Original Message----- > |From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > |Jouni Korhonen > |Sent: jueves, 03 de enero de 2013 13:05 > |To: [email protected] > |Cc: Julien Laganier > |Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for WG Adoption of a "current practices and gap > |analysis" document > | > | > |Folks, > | > |Just a reminder that ~one more week time to voice your preference! > | > |- Jouni > | > | > |On Dec 20, 2012, at 11:06 AM, Jouni Korhonen <[email protected]> > wrote: > | > |> > |> On Dec 20, 2012, at 2:05 AM, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano > |<[email protected]> wrote: > |> > |>> Dear chairs, > |>> > |>> We have been working on an update of draft-zuniga-dmm-gap-analysis, > |>> addressing the comments received on the mailing list and during the > |>> last meeting. Main changes from -02 are: > |>> > |>> - New section on 3GPP mobility. > |>> - New section on functional analysis. > |>> - New section on combined solution analysis. > |>> - Several fixes and clean-ups. > |>> > |>> We'd like to ask the chairs to replace [1] below with the new > |>> revision (draft-zuniga-dmm-gap-analysis-03), that we have just > |submitted. > |> > |> > |> This is OK. Consider -03 as the document [1] for the adoption call. > |> > |> - Jouni & Julien. > |> > |> > |> > |> > |>> > |>> Thanks! > |>> > |>> Carlos > |>> > |>> On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 22:25 +0200, Jouni Korhonen wrote: > |>>> Folks, > |>>> > |>>> We are unfortunately slipping our milestone, our (chairs) apologies > |for that. The next step is to select a "current practices and gap > |analysis" document to serve as the basis for the future WG document. We > |consider two documents on this topic to choose from: > |>>> > |>>> [1] draft-zuniga-dmm-gap-analysis-02 [2] > |>>> draft-liu-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01 > |>>> > |>>> and we as a WG need to decide which one is going to form the > |>>> _basis_ > |for the WG document. > |>>> > |>>> Please voice your preference either for [1] or for [2] on the > |mailing list. We would appreciate if you can also provide a one-liner > |justification for your selection. The chairs will determine if there is > |(rough) consensus from active WG participants to proceed with selecting > |one document against the other. > |>>> > |>>> The call starts today 19th Dec 2012 and ends by 10th Jan 2013. We > |have a longer three week call now due the holiday season in between. > |>>> > |>>> - Jouni & Julien > |>>> _______________________________________________ > |>>> dmm mailing list > |>>> [email protected] > |>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > |>> > |>> > |>> _______________________________________________ > |>> dmm mailing list > |>> [email protected] > |>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > |> > | > |_______________________________________________ > |dmm mailing list > |[email protected] > |https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
