Thanks Sri, Do you implement error code 144? Has there been any issues with your RFC 5555 implementation (if you have an implementation of course)?
Hesham -----Original Message----- From: "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgund...@cisco.com> Date: Monday, 28 January 2013 7:17 PM To: Hesham Soliman <hes...@elevatemobile.com>, "dmm@ietf.org" <dmm@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [DMM] Implementations of RFC 4285 >Hi Hesham, > >Yes. We do have implementations and field deployments based on 4285. Its >supported on number of platforms supporting mobile routers/home agent and >also a variant used between MAG and LMA. > >Regards >Sri > > > > >On 1/23/13 5:53 AM, "Hesham Soliman" <hes...@elevatemobile.com> wrote: > >>Hi all, >> >>I was discussing this with Brian off-line and thought the list might know >>more. Does anyone know of RFC 4285 implementations? >> >>The reason I ask is that it seems we have a conflict in an error code >>(144) interpretation between RFCs 5555 and 4285. Obviously 5555 shouldn't >>have used error code 144 for that purpose but it slipped passed us all it >>seems. So, it would be good to know if there are any 4285 implementations >>out there to see if there is a problem already in practice between the >>two >>RFCs. >> >>Thanks, >>Hesham >> >> >> >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>dmm mailing list >>dmm@ietf.org >>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
