Hi Fred,

Why don't you submit it as a solution draft to dmm?

Then you can push for your draft instead of arguing for something that we
don't know what.

Regards,

Behcet


On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Templin, Fred L
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Hi Jouni,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jouni Korhonen [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2014 9:04 PM
> > To: Templin, Fred L
> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [DMM] DMM WG next steps
> >
> > Fred,
> >
> > On Mar 11, 2014, at 11:48 PM, "Templin, Fred L" <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Jouni,
> > >
> > > I think AERO fits paragraph 3 of the proposed new charter. AERO is a
> > > mobility solution for IPv6, where each node gets at least a /64. It
> > > has in-built route optimization, and can run over either IPv6 or IPv4
> > > networks as a "link layer" for mobility. AERO expects a distributed
> > > mobility management environment, where a network of servers and
> > > relays keeps track of mobile node locations without single point
> > > of failure concerns.
> > >
> > > AERO is somewhat like MIPv6, but differs in that it treats the
> > > underlying network as a link-layer for IPv6 using a non-broadcast
> > > multiple access (NBMA) interface model. AERO uses IPv6 ND messaging
> > > and the IPv6 neighbor cache on the AERO "link" instead of MIPv6
> > > mechanisms, and uses DHCPv6 PD exchanges instead of RS/RA for mobile
> > > node coordinations. The mobile nodes can therefore act as mobile
> > > routers and can provide stable network access for their connected
> > > networks (where each mobile node and its connected networks is
> > > a "site").
> > >
> > > Here is a pointer to the spec. Please have a look and let me know
> > > what you think,
> >
> > There has been zero prior discussion or activity on this
> > topic in DMM that I recall. Furthermore, the current draft
> > seems to be a bis of RFC6707, driven by a single individual
> > and quite far in the preparation so I do not see a reason
> > involving this into the WG work.
>
> AERO is about mobility in general and distributed mobility management
> in particular. It also provides a solution to the route optimization
> problem cited in RFC5522 (which came from MEXT).
>
> AERO should be of interest to anyone interested in network mobilitiy,
> route optimization and distributed mobility management. IMHO, it is
> a better way of doing things than prior methods and this group would
> do well to consider it.
>
> Thanks - Fred
> [email protected]
>
> > - JOuni
> >
> >
> > >
> > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-templin-aerolink/
> > >
> > > Thanks - Fred
> > > [email protected]
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: dmm [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jouni Korhonen
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 2:10 AM
> > >> To: [email protected]
> > >> Cc: [email protected]
> > >> Subject: [DMM] DMM WG next steps
> > >>
> > >> Folks,
> > >>
> > >> DMM WG has done some progress lately. The requirements document has
> > >> already left the building and the gap analysis is heading to WGLC as
> > >> we speak. It is about the time to think what we should do next now
> > >> that we have grown out of the infancy.
> > >>
> > >> A smaller group of mobility enthusiasts have been discussing about
> > >> possible next steps and how the possible new charter would look like.
> > >> The current very draft text template can be found here:
> > >>    https://github.com/jounikor/dmm-re-charter
> > >>
> > >> As you can see, we are still in early stages and all input it welcome.
> > >> Obviously, possible re-chartering depends on many things. For example,
> > >> things like getting the gap analysis out of the WG and what the IESG
> > >> says. Nothing has been fixed or decided yet. Anyhow, we will start the
> > >> discussion on re-chartering with the expectation that the DMM WG will
> > >> re-charter and continue developing new solutions and/or enhancements
> > >> in the IP mobility space.
> > >>
> > >> - Jouni & Dapeng
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> dmm mailing list
> > >> [email protected]
> > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

Reply via email to