+1 Regards,
Behcet On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 3:55 AM, Ryuji Wakikawa <[email protected]>wrote: > Jouni > > It’s good to see some room for non-MIP based solution in DMM;-) > > One clarification, the charter said following > > "Specifically, when solutions are not > based on IP mobility protocols, the DMM workingvgroup shall cooperate > with other IETF working groups working on other technologies that > might allow the mobility of an end host. These working groups include > but are not limited to I2rs, Lisp, and Forces." > > If we need to extend existing non-MIP protocols, it is reasonable to > do extension in the working group owning the protocol. I agree on the > charter. > > However, DMM should work on documenting “how to use it”. The document > should > be informational or experimental. Is this scope of DMM? > > btw, you may add IDR in the listed of working group. > > thanks > ryuji > > > 2014/03/17 午後3:41、Jouni Korhonen <[email protected]> のメール： > > > Folks, > > > > I have updated the charter draft text slightly: > > > https://github.com/jounikor/dmm-re-charter/blob/master/recharter_draft.txt > > > > Basically: > > > > Added Sri's comment on PMIPv6 maintenance. > > Added Alper's comment of location of mobility functions. > > Added links to other IETF WGs on possible mobility enabling technologies. > > Added a comment that virtualised network functions are in scope. > > > > - Jouni > > > > _______________________________________________ > > dmm mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >
_______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
