Hi, Sri, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) wrote: > > > > > On 3/20/14 5:54 AM, "Peter McCann" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I think our extensions should be to the prefix information option and >> not DHCP. >> >> The properties of an address may change after a handover and we should >> not couple the DHCP state machine (which is about lease renewal) to the >> handover state machine. > > Hi Pete, > > This is a good comment. If we are making any assumption that even > after a handover, the DHCP transactions are still hitting the same > DHCP server node, this may be a valid concern. But, if DHCP > transactions are locally terminated after handover (Ex: RFC5844/MAG), > then the updated properties can be provided as part of the new DHCP > transaction. Some parameters such as MTU settings do change after an > handover and so we can probably agree that address properties can change as > well. > > > Regards > Sri
I really don't think we should force DHCP to re-run on every handover. I thought one of the motivations for network-based mobility was to minimize the signaling to the MN during handover. -Pete _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
