John, Correct.
-- Jouni Korhonen Broadcom (Sent from my mobile..) > John Kaippallimalil <[email protected]> kirjoitti 6.6.2014 kello > 17.56: > > Hi Alper, All: > > Towards the end of the charter, there is a paragraph that states: > "Although the maintenance of stable home address(es) and/or prefix(es) > and upper level sessions is a desirable goal when mobile hosts/routers > change their point of attachment to the Internet, it is not a strict > requirement. Mobile hosts/routers should not assume that IP > addressing including home address(es) and/or home network prefix(es) > remain the same throughout the entire upper level session lifetime, > or that support for mobility functions is provided on the network side > in all conditions, unless these properties are specifically indicated > to the mobile node and its applications from the network." > > > I suppose this clarifies that the “anchor re-selection” can apply to a single > session also? > > BR, > John > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: dmm [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alper Yegin > > Sent: Friday, June 06, 2014 9:38 AM > > To: Jouni Korhonen > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [DMM] draft charter text updates in github.. > > > > Hello Jouni, DMM folks, > > > > We better clarify what "anchor re-selection" stands for. > > If it is about selecting different anchors for different IP flows, that's > > one > > thing. > > If it is about changing the IP anchor in the middle of an IP flow, that's > > another thing. And that other thing needs to be scoped out. A basic > > understanding of a use case would be appreciated (just an explanation for > > discussion, I'm not asking for another I-D!), and identification of various > > aspects of that scenario which translate to work items for DMM WG. > > > > I won't be in the call today. So, consider this for a discussion. Follow up > > on > > the mailing list afterwards would be good. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Alper > > > > > > > > On Jun 6, 2014, at 2:47 PM, Jouni Korhonen wrote: > > > > > Folks, > > > > > > Minor changes.. > > > > > > https://github.com/jounikor/dmm-re-charter/blob/master/recharter_draft.txt > > > > > > IMHO..the charter as it is today, would allow pretty much any solution > > > from > > legacy anchoring to herd of pigeons carrying IP.. ;-) > > > > > > I have put in editorial changes of my own and clear text proposals > > > received > > from others. > > > > > > - Jouni > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > dmm mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > > > > _______________________________________________ > > dmm mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
_______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
