From meeting minutes: (Jouni) "I suggest that we left the bullet as a work item and we do not have explicit milestone for it. we can add this milestone when we actually see that there is something meaningful forming for that document. "
The decision at the meeting was to leave the work item in the charter, but not to associate a specific milestone with it until the WG sees what goes into that document. It was not fully clear what would be in that document, and it's a concern that the rest of the WG documents would be gated by such a document. Jouni's above suggestion is a good way forward IMO. Alper On Sep 3, 2014, at 9:53 PM, Brian Haberman wrote: > Behcet, > > On 9/3/14 2:33 PM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote: >> >> You don't seem to understand my points. > > That is quite possible. Your comment on the list was "I am against any > deployment work before we decide on a solution..." > > I read that as an objection to having the deployment models work item on > the agenda. Please do tell me what I am missing. > > Regards, > Brian > > > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list > dmm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
_______________________________________________ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
