Hi Marco,
On 9/11/14 9:16 AM, "Marco Liebsch" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi Sri, please see inline. > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) [mailto:[email protected]] >>Sent: Donnerstag, 11. September 2014 15:58 >>To: Marco Liebsch; Charlie Perkins; [email protected] >>Cc: Vijay Devarapalli >>Subject: Re: [DMM] regarding the re-chartering.. >> >>I do not see a reason why multiple MN-Id instances need to be present in >>a >>single message ? In my experience, this is strictly a deployment >>consideration, >>when to use what type of identifiers. > >Then there is no issue and it's the cleanest approach. Multiple IDs >possible, >deployment determines which type to use, single MNID present. Done. Ack. That will have least impact on the existing specs. Regards Sri _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
