On 9/12/14 2:36 AM, "Alexandru Petrescu" <alexandru.petre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Sri - I agree that specifications allow certain handovers. > >I am not sure what do you mean by Mobile VPN? Mobile IP using a MH-HA >tunnel with a VPN-style tunnel? A VPN which changes the source address >with a new IKE exchange? These are two different things. > >In my experience, once I successfully set up a VPN tunnel on a Host >computer its Mobile IP implementation will no longer work, and >vice-versa; although each one can support mobility ok, independently, to >a certain extent. Alex, No. Depends on how you tie the Mobile IP and IKE session. Sure, if you use CoA for IKE/IPsec, your IPsec session is dead after each Mobile IP handoff. Instead, use the HoA for IKE transaction; Mobile IP offers mobility to HoA. IKE/IPsec session is an application using that HoA :) The result is Mobile VPN :) It works, we had a product on Windows many years back. Sri _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
