On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 4:36 AM, Alexandru Petrescu <[email protected]> wrote: > Le 11/09/2014 00:00, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) a écrit : >> >> Hi Fred, >> >> On 9/4/14 7:50 AM, "Templin, Fred L" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>> No, in that "VPN" is cited in the scenario and VPN+Mobile IP are not >>>> working well together. >>> >>> >>> Right - switching between VPN and non-VPN will be important for >>> enterprise network mobile device users. >> >> >> >> I think Alex is referring to the DSMIP and IKEv2 interactions and I don't >> believe his point is about switching across VPN and non-VPN modes. >> >> FWIW, the 3GPP S2b interface allows a mobile node to perform handovers >> from 3GPP access (S5/S8) to non-3GPP access (S2b). >> >> There are other examples of Mobile VPN solutions that are deployed and are >> based on Mobile IP protocols. RFC5265 is only one example. > > > Sri - I agree that specifications allow certain handovers. > > I am not sure what do you mean by Mobile VPN? Mobile IP using a MH-HA > tunnel with a VPN-style tunnel? A VPN which changes the source address with > a new IKE exchange? These are two different things. > > In my experience, once I successfully set up a VPN tunnel on a Host computer > its Mobile IP implementation will no longer work, and vice-versa; although > each one can support mobility ok, independently, to a certain extent. >
Alex, there is something called MOBIKE RFC 4621. I think it moves IPSec tunnel when MN's address changes. So that could be used with VPN. Regards, Behcet > Alex > > >> >> >> Regards >> Sri >> >> >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
