my apologies for forwarding this conversation to this list without permission from Alper.
Behcet ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Behcet Sarikaya <[email protected]> Date: Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:49 AM Subject: Re: DMM's benefits To: Alper Yegin <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Cc: Jouni Korhonen <[email protected]>, Sri Gundavelli <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Kostas Pentikousis <[email protected]>, Dapeng Liu <[email protected]>, Marco Liebsch <[email protected]>, Peter McCann <[email protected]>, h chan <[email protected]>, Ryuji Wakikawa <[email protected]>, "Zuniga, Juan Carlos" <[email protected]>, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <[email protected]>, Suresh Krishnan <[email protected]>, "[email protected] IMT/OLN" <[email protected]>, Charlie Perkins <[email protected]>, Danny Moses <[email protected]>, John Kaippallimalil <[email protected]> Hi all, Two observations: 1. I don't understand why this mail was not sent to dmm list? So I added it now. 2. It was amazing to see the amount of speculation made just based on the acronym DMM (in Alper's mail). How do we know what DMM solution (let me clarify it a bit) will look like so we can talk about its performance? Isn't this what dmm WG should work on first, keeping in mind performance benefits and other aspects? Regards, Behcet On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 2:15 AM, Alper Yegin <[email protected]> wrote: > Guys, > > We've been talking about cost reduction and e2e latency reduction as the > benefits of DMM (compared to current architectures). > Can you point to any measurements, analysis, simulation, data to back that up? > > I remember Dapeng's analysis from earlier meetings. Do you have anything else > handy? > I need to compile additional evidence ... > > Alper > _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
