-- Jong-Hyouk Lee, living somewhere between /dev/null and /dev/random Protocol Engineering Lab., Sangmyung University
#email: [email protected] #webpage: https://sites.google.com/site/hurryon > On Oct 24, 2014, at 3:40 AM, Behcet Sarikaya <[email protected]> wrote: > > my apologies for forwarding this conversation to this list without > permission from Alper. > > Behcet > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Behcet Sarikaya <[email protected]> > Date: Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:49 AM > Subject: Re: DMM's benefits > To: Alper Yegin <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Cc: Jouni Korhonen <[email protected]>, Sri Gundavelli > <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" > <[email protected]>, Kostas Pentikousis <[email protected]>, > Dapeng Liu <[email protected]>, Marco Liebsch > <[email protected]>, Peter McCann <[email protected]>, h > chan <[email protected]>, Ryuji Wakikawa > <[email protected]>, "Zuniga, Juan Carlos" > <[email protected]>, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano > <[email protected]>, Suresh Krishnan <[email protected]>, > "[email protected] IMT/OLN" <[email protected]>, > Charlie Perkins <[email protected]>, Danny Moses > <[email protected]>, John Kaippallimalil > <[email protected]> > > > Hi all, > > Two observations: > 1. I don't understand why this mail was not sent to dmm list? So I added it > now. > 2. It was amazing to see the amount of speculation made just based on > the acronym DMM (in Alper's mail). > > How do we know what DMM solution (let me clarify it a bit) will look > like so we can talk about its performance? > > Isn't this what dmm WG should work on first, keeping in mind > performance benefits and other aspects? > > Regards, > > Behcet > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 2:15 AM, Alper Yegin <[email protected]> wrote: >> Guys, >> >> We've been talking about cost reduction and e2e latency reduction as the >> benefits of DMM (compared to current architectures). >> Can you point to any measurements, analysis, simulation, data to back that >> up? >> >> I remember Dapeng's analysis from earlier meetings. Do you have anything >> else handy? >> I need to compile additional evidence … Just as references: 1. Distributed IP Mobility Management from the Perspective of the IETF: Motivations, Requirements, Approaches, Comparison, and Challenges", IEEE Wireless Communications Magazine, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 159-168, October 2013. 2. Mobile Data Offloading: A Host-based Distributed Mobility Management Approach", IEEE Internet Computing Magazine, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 20-29, January/February 2014. >> >> Alper >> > > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
