Hi Jouni and Dapeng,

I support this draft as "a" solution draft for now in the WT. Looking at
this draft, it is definitely great, though it should be tailored as more
revisions are proceeded. But regarding the adoption of this draft, I have
some questions to chairs.

This draft is sketched based on a deployment model, which has not been given
by a draft in the relevant WT. Of course, the main idea and concept were
presented by Sri in the past meetings. In this case, does the adoption of
this draft mean that we will go with the deployment model in other WTs?
Because deployment model affects other WTs' progresses and results. That
needs to be clearly arranged.


Best Regards,
Seil Jeon


-----Original Message-----
From: dmm [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jouni Korhonen
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 3:22 PM
To: [email protected]; Jouni; Dapeng Liu; [email protected]
Subject: [DMM] Call for adoption: draft-wt-dmm-fpc-cpdp-00

Folks,

This emails starts a two week call for the I-D
   draft-wt-dmm-fpc-cpdp-00
to confirm the adoption as a DMM WG document. The call ends April 16th EOB
PDT.

Express your support or opposition to the mailing list. During the
IETF92 meeting we got 10 voices for the adoption so at least the same amount
supporting emails should be expected.



- Jouni & Dapeng

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

Reply via email to