On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Seil Jeon <[email protected]> wrote:
> This draft is sketched based on a deployment model, which has not been given > by a draft in the relevant WT. Of course, the main idea and concept were > presented by Sri in the past meetings. In this case, does the adoption of > this draft mean that we will go with the deployment model in other WTs? > Because deployment model affects other WTs' progresses and results. That > needs to be clearly arranged. > As I said before, having WTs work on pieces of the problem without agreeing on a base protocol is not the right way to go. How could a WT improve an aspect without agreeing on what to improve? FWIW, let me say it again. Regards, Behcet _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
