Le 16/04/2015 06:58, Jouni Korhonen a écrit :
Folks,
The adoption call for this I-D has ended. There is a clear concensus to
adopt the I-D as a working group item.
I support its adoption.
We have been working with an identifier specific to automobiles to use
to realize access control. Identifying an entire set of IP nodes
deployed in a vehicle is different than identifying an end-user like
address@realm.
We looked for such an identifier and believe the VIN (Vehicle
Identification Number) be a good candidate.
One would consider using one type, like type 40, to encode the VIN or
parts of it, into an MN-ID.
The questions to the group are the following:
- is VIN considered private information? (in deployments it is private
to a certain extent, but publicly avaliable to cameras or in public
databases to another extent).
- is the MN-ID type 40 ok for it.
- is one type sufficient or should there be subtypes.
Yours,
Alex
- Jouni & Dapeng
4/1/2015, 8:02 AM, Jouni Korhonen kirjoitti:
Folks,
This emails starts a two week call for the I-D
draft-perkins-dmm-4283mnids-01
to confirm the aadoption s a DMM WG document. The call ends April 15th
EOB PST.
Express your support or opposition to the mailing list. During the
IETF92 meeting we got 7 voices for the adoption so at least the same
amount supporting emails should be expected.
- Jouni & Dapeng
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
dmm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
dmm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
