Le 22/04/2015 18:06, Behcet Sarikaya a écrit :
Hi Alex,
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Alexandru Petrescu
<[email protected]> wrote:
Le 16/04/2015 06:58, Jouni Korhonen a écrit :
Folks,
The adoption call for this I-D has ended. There is a clear concensus to
adopt the I-D as a working group item.
I support its adoption.
We have been working with an identifier specific to automobiles to use to
realize access control. Identifying an entire set of IP nodes deployed in a
vehicle is different than identifying an end-user like address@realm.
We looked for such an identifier and believe the VIN (Vehicle Identification
Number) be a good candidate.
One would consider using one type, like type 40, to encode the VIN or parts
of it, into an MN-ID.
The questions to the group are the following:
- is VIN considered private information? (in deployments it is private
to a certain extent, but publicly avaliable to cameras or in public
databases to another extent).
- is the MN-ID type 40 ok for it.
- is one type sufficient or should there be subtypes.
What is your model here in providing Internet access to the car?
As you may know, operators in US are deploying systems that connect
the car to their LTE network upstream and downstream is the passengers
in the car that access over Wi-Fi.
With LTE, you get mobility support which is based on fixed anchoring.
I cc'ed to Raj who works on these types of technologies.
The ID there is the IMSI. I don't think vin is used.
The model of Internet access to the cars for cars currently on market in
Europe is the same - the LTE technology is used, using the IMSI as an
identifier. However, that does not use MN-ID, is only IPv4, is not WiFi
and does not resist to cellular generation upgrades to 5G and beyond.
Newer models will feature IPv6 in addition to IPv4, WiFi handover from
LTE to house's hotspot, continuous sessions, and over-the-air software
update for cheap upgradeability to future generation 5G and beyond.
In this context it is hard to imagine IMSI will be there for a long time
in a given car, and a more permanent identifier is needed.
To Raj - is LTE considering other kinds of identifiers for access
control (other than IMSI) for vehicular environments, like V2X?
Alex
Regards,
Behcet
Yours,
Alex
- Jouni & Dapeng
4/1/2015, 8:02 AM, Jouni Korhonen kirjoitti:
Folks,
This emails starts a two week call for the I-D
draft-perkins-dmm-4283mnids-01
to confirm the aadoption s a DMM WG document. The call ends April 15th
EOB PST.
Express your support or opposition to the mailing list. During the
IETF92 meeting we got 7 voices for the adoption so at least the same
amount supporting emails should be expected.
- Jouni & Dapeng
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
