Checked the diffs and IDNits. Make always sure to comply with IDNits as it
is so easy & cheap tool to use.
- Jouni
------------------------------->
** The document seems to lack an IANA Considerations section. (See Section
2.2 of http://www.ietf.org/id-info/checklist for how to handle the case
when there are no actions for IANA.)
** There is 1 instance of too long lines in the document, the longest one
being 1 character in excess of 72.
Miscellaneous warnings:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
== The document doesn't use any RFC 2119 keywords, yet seems to have RFC
2119 boilerplate text.
-- The document date (October 11, 2015) is 10 days in the past. Is this
intentional?
Checking references for intended status: Proposed Standard
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(See RFCs 3967 and 4897 for information about using normative references
to lower-maturity documents in RFCs)
** Obsolete normative reference: RFC 2461 (Obsoleted by RFC 4861)
** Downref: Normative reference to an Experimental RFC: RFC 6058
** Downref: Normative reference to an Informational RFC: RFC 6879
Summary: 5 errors (**), 0 flaws (~~), 1 warning (==), 1 comment (--).
Run idnits with the --verbose option for more detailed information about
the items above.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 6:44 PM, Z.W. Yan <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear All,
> We just revised the HNP-renumbering draft based on the comments online and
> offline and posted to the DMM WG.
> Any further comments from you are always welcome.
>
> Besides, Jouni and Dapeng,
> Would you please assign me 5-10 minutes to re-introduce this draft in the
> DMM meeting?
>
> BR,
>
>
> 2015-10-13
> ------------------------------
> Z.W. Yan
> ------------------------------
> *发件人：* internet-drafts
> *发送时间：* 2015-10-12 14:33:04
> *收件人：* Zhiwei Yan; XiaoDong Lee; Xiaodong Lee; Jong-Hyouk Lee
> *抄送：*
> *主题：* New Version Notification for draft-yan-dmm-hnprenum-03.txt
>
> A new version of I-D, draft-yan-dmm-hnprenum-03.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Zhiwei Yan and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> Name: draft-yan-dmm-hnprenum
> Revision: 03
> Title: Home Network Prefix Renumbering in PMIPv6
> Document date: 2015-10-11
> Group: Individual Submission
> Pages: 8
> URL:
> https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-yan-dmm-hnprenum-03.txt
> Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yan-dmm-hnprenum/
> Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-yan-dmm-hnprenum-03
> Diff:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-yan-dmm-hnprenum-03
> Abstract:
> In the basic Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) specification, a Mobile Node
> (MN) is assigned with a 64-bit Home Network Prefix (HNP) during its
> initial attachment for the Home Address (HoA) configuration. During
> the movement of the MN, this prefix remains unchanged and in this way
> it is unnecessary for the MN to reconfigure its HoA and reconnect the
> ongoing communications. However, the current protocol (RFC5213) does
> not specify related operations to support the MN to timely receive
> and use a new HNP when the allocated HNP changes. In this draft, a
> solution to support the HNP renumbering is proposed, as an update of
> RFC5213.
>
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> The IETF Secretariat
>
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
