Hello Hakima,
I am O.K. with including more MNID types. The short addresses in Zigbee
are purely local; that might be a consideration that affects inclusion
within a Mobile-IP / dmm oriented draft. I could see arguments either way.
Regarding the other identifiers for IoT -- are they proprietary?
If there is support for the identifiers listed below I will include them
in the next revision.
It has been suggested to include short sections that describe each MNID
type. Would you be willing to contribute some sample section text for
one or more of the RFID types? I don't think it should be very long,
and should not be misconstrued as specifying any of the behavior for
RFID, only as a description.
Regards,
Charlie P.
On 10/19/2015 10:51 PM, Hakima Chaouchi wrote:
Hi Charles, all,
The draft is not mentioning the short addresses in Zigbee (16bits),
lot of sensors use that.
What about the new long range technologies in IoT (Sig Fox, LORA)
Do you think we should consider in this draft a possibility of having
logical identifiers as the Internet of Things main architectures today
are pushing to have an abstraction layer between the application
servers processing the data of the objects (that might be mobile)....
Cheers,
Hakima
2015-10-19 22:39 GMT+02:00 Charlie Perkins
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>:
Hello folks,
The updated MNIDs draft has been posted.
I've incorporated potential resolutions for the recent comments,
especially from Sri. I did not make subsections for each type of
MNID, because I am hoping that won't be considered necessary. I
hope to get some more discussion about it from folks on this
mailing list. Or, if I get a sample text for one of the MNIDs, I
can attempt to create similar text for the other MNIDs. Notably,
doing so would make the short draft about 5 times longer.
Regards,
Charlie P.
On 10/19/2015 1:21 PM, [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line
Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Distributed Mobility
Management Working Group of the IETF.
Title : MN Identifier Types for RFC 4283
Mobile Node Identifier Option
Authors : Charles E. Perkins
Vijay Devarapalli
Filename : draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-01.txt
Pages : 8
Date : 2015-10-19
Abstract:
Additional Identifier Types are proposed for use with the
Mobile Node
Identifier Option for MIPv6 (RFC 4283).
The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids/
There's also a htmlized version available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-01
A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-01
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time
of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at
tools.ietf.org <http://tools.ietf.org>.
Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
