As an individual contributor I support the adoption of this I-D. MCoA is
a feature that we still lack..
The document itself still needs quite a bit of work. For example, I
wonder if the caption for Figure 2 is correct. Also, Section 4.1. option
fiels descriptions are somewhat broken it seems. And so on multiple
small nits like unexpanded acronyms etc. However, these are mainly
editorials. I have no problem with the technical solution.
- Jouni
11/25/2015, 8:22 AM, Dapeng Liu kirjoitti:
Hello all,
In IETF94, we initiated the call for adoption for the draft:
draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02>:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02
Seems have got sufficient support during the meeting. We'd like to
confirm the call for adoption in the mailing list for 2 weeks.
Please send your opinion and comments to the list before December 9.
Thanks,
------
Best Regards,
Dapeng&Jouni
--
------
Best Regards,
Dapeng Liu
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
