Sri, As I wrote to Marco Thursday afternoon III clashes with 5G IP meeting. Please do not use that slot :)
Regards, Behcet On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) < sgund...@cisco.com> wrote: > Thats a great idea. Lets find a slot to discuss with Charlie and > understand the comments. > > Any one interested in attending, send me a unicast note. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Nov 15, 2017, at 10:52 AM, Marco Liebsch <marco.lieb...@neclab.eu> > wrote: > > Can we quickly set up an ad-hoc site meeting here at IETF100? > > E.g. Thursday Afternoon III or later would be possible for me. > > Would be an opportunity to follow-up f2f and further elaborate on that. > > > > marco > > > > > > > > > > > > *From:* dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org <dmm-boun...@ietf.org>] *On > Behalf Of *Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) > *Sent:* Mittwoch, 15. November 2017 03:42 > *To:* vojislav vucetic > *Cc:* Charlie Perkins; dmm@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: [DMM] Fwd: Re: [5gangip] To initiate user-plane study work > in 3GPP > > > > Like I said, concern is valid. The deliverable about that study. If it > turns out there is no significant optimizations that operators can convince > operators, then we will drop the work. > > > > > > Sri > > > > *From: *vojislav vucetic <vvuce...@outlook.com> > *Date: *Tuesday, November 14, 2017 at 6:35 PM > *To: *Sri Gundavelli <sgund...@cisco.com> > *Cc: *Charlie Perkins <charles.perk...@earthlink.net>, "dmm@ietf.org" < > dmm@ietf.org> > *Subject: *Re: [DMM] Fwd: Re: [5gangip] To initiate user-plane study work > in 3GPP > > > > He put you on the spot👹 > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Nov 14, 2017, at 7:13 PM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) <sgund...@cisco.com> > wrote: > > Hi Charlie, > > > > Fair point! As part of these efforts, we need to understand and quantify > those optimizations. For not all work items, we need blessing from anyone > before we initiate any new work, we do what the community believes is the > right thing here. This work is less about building a solution, and more > about investigation. This is one of those items where can bring possibly > great optimizations to the mobile data plane. We lost the signaling war > (after CDMA2000 ended) for various reasons, less technical and more about > legacy and other reasons, but that does not mean we will fail every time. > > > > > > Sri > > > > > > *From: *dmm <dmm-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Charlie Perkins < > charles.perk...@earthlink.net> > *Date: *Tuesday, November 14, 2017 at 4:43 PM > *To: *"dmm@ietf.org" <dmm@ietf.org> > *Subject: *[DMM] Fwd: Re: [5gangip] To initiate user-plane study work in > 3GPP > > > > Hello folks, > > I stumbled across this terrific diagram from email that was sent by > Satoru-san yesterday. I think it's an indication that current operators > are not really asking for a simplified data plane. Or, at least, that we > really need to understand under what conditions they would accept an > IETF-designed simplified data plane before embarking on a solution for > their needs. > > Regards, > Charlie P. > > PS. I hope it is O.K. to forward this email... > > ====================================================================== > > > Alex, > > > > .... > > Please take a look at the attached picture which one of the realities > happened in some operator. > > > > Cheers, > > --satoru > > <image001.png> > > > > <PastedGraphic-5.png> > > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list > dmm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > > > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list > dmm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > >
_______________________________________________ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
