Folks:

The document is focused on compiling 3GPP requirements for potential 
replacement of GTP on N9
interface and to compare the various IETF protocols against those requirements. 
There will not be
specification development in this paper. As an operator, we would like to see 
that we utilize the best
protocols that would simplify the network and help in efficient utilization and 
operation of the networks.

There are many specifications in 3GPP (and many that are work-in-progress for 
5G). I compiled the 5G
Architecture description and requirements from many specifications from 3GPP 
SA2, CT and RAN WGs.
Please provide feedback on whether these requirements are sufficient to develop 
protocols in IETF
and to compare them.

The study in CT4 does not start till July 2018, so there is an opportunity to 
do some work in IETF and
use it in 3GPP.

===============================================
Kalyani Bogineni, Ph.D.
Fellow, Technology Architecture & Strategy
Verizon, One Verizon Way, Basking Ridge, NJ 07920
[https://www.certmetrics.com/amazon/Telerik.Web.UI.WebResource.axd?imgid=0f8b72e68d5e45f59d7683fe343f0f15&type=rbi]<javascript:__doPostBack('ctl00$mainContent$ctrlBadgeList$rptActiveCerts$ctl00$lnkBtnShowBadge','')>



From: Behcet Sarikaya [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 5:37 PM
To: Satoru Matsushima <[email protected]>
Cc: Bogineni, Kalyani <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject: [E] Re: [DMM] white paper for optimized mobile user plane solutions 
for 5G

Hi dmm folks,

I think that Kalyani is going to send a revised version of the outtline not 
including the items that are not of interest in dmm group.

Regards,

Behcet

On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Satoru Matsushima 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hello Kalyani,

+1. White paper looks a good work to start the user-plane study here in IETF. I 
support it.

I think that comparison with quantitive measurements may need to use specific 
deployment metrics in each operator.

But through this white paper work, if we figure out clear criteria for 
apple-to-apple comparison to candidate protocols for 3GPP use cases, that would 
be greatly help to move the study forward.

Hope that make sense and work with you on it.

Cheers,
--satoru

> 2017/12/14 6:13、Bogineni, Kalyani 
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>のメール:
>
> Folks:
>
> In response to the 3GPP CT4 study item on user plane protocols, we propose 
> that a white paper
> be developed that can compare the different IETF protocols. Attached is an 
> outline. Please let me
> know if you would like to contribute.
>
> Kalyani Bogineni
> Verizon
>
> <draft-bogineni-dmm-optimized-mobile-user-plane-solutions-00.docx>_______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_dmm&d=DwMFaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=IdiSODh8aDRjdCeGgd9MznLHMYKgKcs_YSwXBDiaofh47oilzaXYRYETcBynUdpT&m=qUxNU7-us1fbB3TN4NO1-T2Bo4VZWyqmizRRyE_dLtw&s=SUulEkrxX1-QL54oZJyU-sKVDQDzFku8eLEy9LS6yKU&e=>

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_dmm&d=DwMFaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=IdiSODh8aDRjdCeGgd9MznLHMYKgKcs_YSwXBDiaofh47oilzaXYRYETcBynUdpT&m=qUxNU7-us1fbB3TN4NO1-T2Bo4VZWyqmizRRyE_dLtw&s=SUulEkrxX1-QL54oZJyU-sKVDQDzFku8eLEy9LS6yKU&e=>

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

Reply via email to