Le 27/01/2018 à 21:23, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) a écrit :
[...]
We need to bring the work in scope and accelerate the adoption process for
ND based extension.

Do you mean ND extension that would do Prefix Delegation?

I am asking, because you list approaches of coloring IP addresses with mobility properties (fixed, non persistent, graceful replacement) and then talk about approaches for assigning meta-data procedures. I do not understand.

What I need is that when operators assign a /56 prefix (not an address) to an IoT router that prefix to have a property among: fixed, long-lasting after re-connection, or after handover. Or maybe changing after re-connection, or after handover. The terminology 'fixed/changing/session-lasting' can vary, but there must be a way to request 'fixed'.

Remark I am talking about a /56 _prefix_, not a /64 prefix. A /64 prefix is useless for an IoT Router.

Remark I am talking about a prefix, not about an address.

Alex

 For now, I am ignoring the discussion on what
approach/option that will be used for this.

The LS does not talk about IKEv2 or DHCP, but we need to have a discussion
on that as well.




3.) The approach of indicating the color to the applications on the mobile
node


This is about extending socket interface with the property tags. This is
covered in draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-13, and the draft is on track
to become a proposed standard.



Based on this, we can say the gap is in #2 and that IETF/DMM WG is looking
at various proposals. Most likely, and very soon, the WG will finalize the
approach and will have a working document covering this extension. The WG
will also try to meet the 3GPP release targets for this work item.


Please comment, if you have any comments on this response.


Regards
Sri






On 1/16/18, 2:45 PM, "Liaison Statement Management Tool"
<l...@ietf.org>
wrote:

Title: LS on indicating service continuity usage of the additional
IPv6
prefix in Router Advertisement
Submission Date: 2018-01-16
URL of the IETF Web page: https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1554/

From: Chang hong <chang.hong.s...@intel.com>
To: Sri Gundavelli <sgund...@cisco.com>,Dapeng Liu
<maxpass...@gmail.com>,Terry Manderson
<terry.mander...@icann.org>,Suresh
Krishnan <sur...@kaloom.com>,Robert Hinden <bob.hin...@gmail.com>,Ole
Troan <otr...@employees.org>
Cc: Dapeng Liu <maxpass...@gmail.com>,Terry Manderson
<terry.mander...@icann.org>,IPv6 Maintenance Discussion List
<i...@ietf.org>,Ole Troan <otr...@employees.org>,Sri Gundavelli
<sgund...@cisco.com>,The IETF Chair <ch...@ietf.org>,Robert Hinden
<bob.hin...@gmail.com>,Distributed Mobility Management Discussion List
<dmm@ietf.org>,Suresh Krishnan <sur...@kaloom.com>
Response Contacts: georg.mayer.hua...@gmx.com,3gppliai...@etsi.org
Technical Contacts:
Purpose: For information

Body: 1. Overall Description:
3GPP working group SA2 (System Architecture) would like to inform the
IETF that SA2 has defined three SSC (Session and Service Continuity)
modes in 3GPP TS 23.501 ("Architecture for the 5G System") clause
5.6.9
as follows:
-     With SSC mode 1, the network preserves the connectivity service
provided to the UE. For the case of PDU Session of IPv4 or IPv6 type,
the
IP address is preserved.
-     With SSC mode 2, the network may release the connectivity
service
delivered to the UE and release the corresponding PDU Session. For the
case of IPv4 or IPv6 type, the network may release IP address(es) that
had been allocated to the UE.
-     With SSC mode 3, changes to the user plane can be visible to the
UE,
while the network ensures that the UE suffers no loss of connectivity.
A
connection through new PDU Session Anchor point is established before
the
previous connection is terminated in order to allow for better service
continuity. For the case of IPv4 or IPv6 type, the IP address is not
preserved in this mode when the PDU Session Anchor changes.
SA2 has also adopted the use of IPv6 multi-homing in a PDU Session
(referred to as "multi-homed IPv6 PDU Session") as described in 3GPP
TS
23.501 clause 5.6.4.3, a PDU Session being an association between the
UE
and a Data Network that provides a data connectivity service, which is
also defined in 3GPP TS 23.501.
When a new IPv6 Prefix is assigned to the UE for a multi-homed IPv6
PDU
Session, SA2 has decided to use the Router Advertisement message
according to IETF RFC 4191 to deliver the new IPv6 prefix to the UE
and
configure the Routing Rules in the UE by using the Route Information
Option.
SA2 is looking for a mechanism to deliver information regarding the
service continuity usage (e.g. whether the prefix can be replaced with
or
without grace period) associated with the new IPv6 prefix to the UE
via
the 5G System user plane.

SA2 understands that the IETF draft
"draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-12"
defines four IP address types that can be mapped to the three SSC
modes
as follows:

-     SSC mode 1 corresponds to either FIXED or SESSION_LASTING;
-     SSC mode 2 corresponds to NON_PERSISTENT;
-     SSC mode 3 corresponds to GRACEFUL_REPLACEMENT.

SA2 would like to understand if there is any IETF work related to
delivery of the IP address type (according to IETF draft
"draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-12") in the Router Advertisement
message, which could be used for delivery of the service continuity
usage
associated with a new IPv6 prefix in a multi-homed IPv6 PDU Session.

2. Actions:
To IETF Internet Area, DMM, 6MAN:
ACTION:       SA2 respectfully asks IETF Internet Area, DMM and 6MAN
to
provide feedback on any IETF work related to delivery of IP address
type
(according to IETF draft "draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-12") in the
Router Advertisement message.

3. Date of Next SA2 Meetings:
3GPPSA2#125  OR 22 - 26 Jan 2018    Gothenburg       SE
3GPPSA2#126  OR 26 Feb - 2 Mar 2018    US            US
Attachments:

S2-179625_e-mail_rev2_S2-179363_LS_out_to_IETF_Internet_Area_DMM_6MAN

https://www.ietf.org/lib/dt/documents/LIAISON/liaison-2018-01-16-3gpp-
t
sg
s
a-sa2-int-6man-dmm-ls-on-indicating-service-continuity-usage-of-the-ad
d
it
i
onal-ipv6-prefix-in-router-advertisement-attachment-1.doc


_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
dmm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
dmm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
dmm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm


_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
dmm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

Reply via email to