Thanks Carlos.

Folks - Please review the document and post your feedback.

At IETF100, we polled the WG feedback for adopting this document and there
was consensus for adopting this document. However, we chose not to adopt
the document as there were no recent discussions in the mailer on this
document. We therefore request the WG for feedback in the mailer. We plan
to issue an adoption call post IETF101, but we need some feedback and
substantial comments.

Dapeng & Sri

On 3/6/18, 2:17 PM, "dmm on behalf of Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano"
< on behalf of> wrote:

>We have submitted a revised version of our draft addressing the
>comments we got in Singapore:
>- Added some statements about which model from draft-ietf-dmm-
>deployment-models our solution follows (addressing a comment received
>from Sri).
>- Added some text relating to draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility
>(addressing a comment received from Danny).
>Additionally, we added some terminology from draft-ietf-dmm-deployment-
>models and other minor changes.
>In Singapore we got quite good support of the document. I'd like to
>request feedback/reviews from the WG.

dmm mailing list

Reply via email to