Hi Carlos, Thanks for the improvement of the document, I think the document is well structured and provide a good solution for distributed mobility management. The following are some of my comments: 1. Page7. "...MAAR1 definitely stores the temporal BCE previously allocated and unicasts a Router Advertisement (RA) to the MN including the prefix reserved before..."，The prefix allocation to MN is restricted to RA mechanism, but there would be alternative methods, for instance in 4G, network can send prefix information through 3GPP-specific signaling. So i think it's better to consider whether restricted to RA or not. 2. As MN moves across MAARs there could be many P-MAAR exist, It's better to give a brief description of how to cope with it. 3. The solution doesn't differentiate different session continuity requirement, so how the solution coexist with the on-demand solution, or you want to promote a solution independent from the on-demand one? 4. Page13. There is no reference for "HSS", I suggest add a reference for it, or just remove it. 5. Page15. " ...sent over those logical interfaces playing the role of anchoring MAARs (different from the serving one) include a zero prefix lifetime... " Two lifetime related fields is included in RA message, Vaild Lifetime and Preferred Lifetime, I think the lifetime you mentioned is Preferred Lifetime. Maybe how to set the value of Valid Lifetime should be described.
Regards, -Xinpeng (Jackie) -----Original Message----- From: dmm [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2018 6:18 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [DMM] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-bernardos-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01.txt] Hi, We have submitted a revised version of our draft addressing the comments we got in Singapore: - Added some statements about which model from draft-ietf-dmm- deployment-models our solution follows (addressing a comment received from Sri). - Added some text relating to draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility (addressing a comment received from Danny). Additionally, we added some terminology from draft-ietf-dmm-deployment- models and other minor changes. In Singapore we got quite good support of the document. I'd like to request feedback/reviews from the WG. Thanks! Carlos _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
