Hi Pablo, >As I already clarified in my previous email, the proposal of >draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane is independent from the underlay network. Great. Thanks. >As I already said in my previous email, we will clarify this in the next >revision of the draft. Sure.
Btw, you responded to Arash’s comments addressing me. Some parts of the draft already maintained that independence with SRv6 features in underlay (for example Section 5.3). In summary if you could address: 1. Section 5.1 Traditional mode (Tom’s comment on terminology and IP-in-IP with no relation to SR?) 2. Section 5.2 Enhanced mode. Here SR path steering features are used and not fully described what happens to TEID (as GTP is gone). 3. And if TEID after GTP removal is encoded in each SID in the SRH or this is only specific to some PDU session as you indicated in your first email. Thx! -- Uma C.
_______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
