Hi,

+1 for adoption. There is a lot of useful content in this document and
adoption can only help to make it better.
IETF seems the primary audience to me.

Luca


On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 1:34 AM Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Folks:
>
> During IETF 102 and 103, the authors of the document,
> draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis.txt have provided the overview of this
> document. The chairs felt there is good amount of work that went into the
> document and the analysis has value. The document quality is very high.
> There was also generally good feedback and interest for the work from the
> community. We are therefore considering adopting this document as a DMM
> WG document, to be moved on Informational Standards track.
>
> There were also few concerns/comments on the 1.) Relevance of this
> document to 3GPP in the immediate time frame 2.) Archival Value of the
> document 3.) Target Audience  - IETF or 3GPP.
> On #3, there was also a view that the document should be restructured to
> make it IETF focussed.  With this background, we would like to ask the WG
> to provide some feedback on their interest for this work. Please provide
> substantial comments as why this should be adopted, or why it should not be
> adopted. If there is interest, and if there are no other concerns from
> AD/IESG/Others, then we may take up this work at some point.
>
> Draft Pointer: 
> *https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-02
> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-02>*
>
> The adoption call will end on 4th of December, 2019.
>
> Regards
> Dapping & Sri
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

Reply via email to