Hi Dave,
Thank you for reviewing our draft and sending your thought for the adoption.
When I reviewed the charter I couldn't find any text to make the draft
to be out of scope. Could you please elaborate it with the text in the
charter?
Best regards,
Shunsuke
On 2018/11/15 6:52, David Allan I wrote:
HI
AFAIK 3GPP CT4 is looking for work it can adopt, and has indicated that
it wishes to perform the analysis itself. When they were directed to
this document in the recent IETF DMM liaison, it resulted in a liaison
reply clearly indicated they would define their own criteria.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1590/
However in the draft it states in the introduction: “However we believe
that to provide adequate information for 3GPP, we need to clearly
understand what the current user plane protocol is in Release 15, and
architectural requirements for the user plane.” And in the conclusion
“Our conclusion here is that we suggest the UP protocol study work in
3GPP takes into account the evaluation aspects described in Section 5.”,
there is more, but I do not feel a need to be pedantic about it.
So the purpose of this draft seems to explicitly be to do work for 3GPP
that they have explicitly said they DO NOT WANT.
At the same time I do not see anything in the charter that suggests we
should be doing this work either. It would appear to have little to do
with DMM’s chartered direction.
As such I am opposed to adoption of the draft.
Cheers
Dave
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
dmm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
--
----------------------------------
Shunsuke Homma
<homma.shuns...@lab.ntt.co.jp>
TEL: +81 422 59 3486
FAX: +81 422 60 7460
NTT Network Service Systems Labs.
Musashino city, Tokyo, Japan
----------------------------------
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
dmm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
