On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 3:53 PM David Allan I <[email protected]> wrote:
> HI > > > > AFAIK 3GPP CT4 is looking for work it can adopt, and has indicated that it > wishes to perform the analysis itself. When they were directed to this > document in the recent IETF DMM liaison, it resulted in a liaison reply > clearly indicated they would define their own criteria. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1590/ > > > > However in the draft it states in the introduction: “However we believe > that to provide adequate information for 3GPP, we need to clearly > understand what the current user plane protocol is in Release 15, and > architectural requirements for the user plane.” And in the conclusion “Our > conclusion here is that we suggest the UP protocol study work in 3GPP takes > into account the evaluation aspects described in Section 5.”, there is > more, but I do not feel a need to be pedantic about it. > > > > So the purpose of this draft seems to explicitly be to do work for 3GPP > that they have explicitly said they DO NOT WANT. > > > > At the same time I do not see anything in the charter that suggests we > should be doing this work either. It would appear to have little to do > with DMM’s chartered direction. > > > > As such I am opposed to adoption of the draft. > > > +1 I had raised similar issues before. BTW no offense to Shunsuke. and no offense to my friend Sri :-) Behcet > Cheers > > Dave > > > > > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >
_______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
