Hi Fred, We’ll add the ref in the next revision. Thanks for the feedback.
Carlos On Mon, 21 Jan 2019 at 19:09, Templin (US), Fred L < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Carlos, > > > > I think it would be worth considering this model both on its own merits > and/or > > in conjunction with the dmm document. The notion of a “home network” need > > not be preserved, and instead we have scalable de-aggregation. Please have > a > > look (as I did for the dmm doc) and post comments or questions. > > > > I think this is already considered in the " Mobility case, anchor > relocation" in the draft. We can add additional references as examples of > this, but I'd prefer not to add more text, as we are trying to keep the > document short and what you have described is covered IMHO with the current > text. > > > > >> Scalable de-aggregation (and the routing system required to route it ) > is not covered in > > >> ‘draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring’; it is covered in > ‘draft-ietf-rtgwg-atn-bgp’ > > >> (a wg item of the RTGWG) and ‘draft-templin-intarea-6706bis’ from which > the RTGWG > > >> doc was derived. Please add references and supporting text. > > >> > > >> Thanks - Fred > -- Sent from a mobile device, please excuse any brevity or typing errors.
_______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
